These discoveries were originally developed from observations of managerial roles and the behaviour of managers within large organizations. The hierarchy discovered by Elliot Jaques and Wilfred Brown was referred to regularly as «levels of work».
The Table below offers a summary of the material to be developed in this section. The attempt to be fully general means the language is perhaps slightly strained. Elaboration and examples in the Topics to follow should clarify matters.
Turf disputes associated with Jaques's heritage have bedevilled the field for many years. Labels and specifications of levels have sparked particular controversy: see discussion of alternatives.
L
Responsibility Label
Need to be Met
Response to be Made
WL7
Total Coverage
Determination of organizational identity.
Define basic parameters i.e.► define the basic nature of needs, services and whatever else is required to deal with this mission; plus anything that must be taken as given by all lower levels.
WL6
Multi-field Coverage
Policy formulation and control
Frame operational fields i.e. ► produce frameworks to bridge the divide between basic definitions and all fields or territories of actual operations.
WL5
Field Coverage
Strategy design and implementation
Shape overall operations i.e.► shape the totality of operations and structure needs and services in a particular field and social territory.
WL4
Comprehensive Provision
Management control of developments
Develop multiple services i.e.► comprehensively balance and develop a range of services to meet the needs of some social territory.
WL3
Systematic Provision
Operational control of concrete systems
Manage a specific service i.e.► manage available staff, resources and facilities so as to handle presenting demand, taking into account higher level priorities and inevitable fluctuations in workload and staffing.
A table comparing names for levels in this Framework to similar names for types in the methods of managing-PH'5Q2t and modes in strengthening managing in the face of complexity-PH'5Q2C is provided here, together with the link to using language-PH'5.
Organization Structure & Management of Work
There are 7 potential levels of work as shown in the above Table. These levels are about defining a structure for management within an organization.
The central issue in designing structures and managing a large organization is: what full-time posts are needed at which levels.
The level of work specified for the top post is always the minimum required. The scope, complexity and potential social impact of the organization depends on this minimum. However, all organizations, even the smallest, should address the higher levels of work in regard to determining suitable values and goals.
The variety of specialized activities (kinds of work) combined with the number of levels with specific, formally defined full-time posts determines the organizational complexity and the challenges for managing effectively.
Choice of size is a function of activities that are viewed as unavoidable and those that are aspirational. The greater the aspiration for scope and impact, the more sophisticated the organisation required, and so the more full-time roles in higher levels needed. More on size:
Tiny WL2- and WL1- outfits are barely viewed as organizations needing management, but even they need work on values and goals. By contrast, the success of WL3- and WL4-organizations depends largely on the quality of their management. The most sophisticated management of operations is provided by a WL5-organization. In the largest WL7- or WL6-organizations, there is a headquarters body distinct from the operational subsidiaries, each typically set up at WL5.
Describing the Work-Levels
The next topic offers a basic account of the nature of the output at each level in terms of needs to be met and responses to be made. Examples are provided to illustrate characteristic level-specific tasks, jobs and organizations. The characteristic time-scales, deadlines for task completion, are identified. Common titles given to posts are noted.
The levels of management can also be appreciated as progressive contexts described in terms of planning, resource handling and information management.